Security Basics mailing list archives
Wireless Encryption Methods (eg; WPA2) vs Forced Secure Proxy Redirects
From: Chip Panarchy <forumanarchy () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 23:19:14 +1100
Hello I have noticed recently that most cafés which offer Free WiFi do so, not with a Wireless Encryption Method (WEP, WPA, WPA2, LEAP etc.) but with a Forced-Proxy Redirect. (usually https with 128-bit encryption) (I'm sure there's a better way of saying 'Forced-Proxy Redirect'...) What are the Security implications of using the Forced-Proxy Redirect method rather than a Wireless Encryption Method? Does the traffic still get tunnelled securely? What are the advantages & disadvantages when comparing these two Design choices? Please alleviate my concerns. Thanks in advance, Chip D. Panarchy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates. http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442f727d1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Wireless Encryption Methods (eg; WPA2) vs Forced Secure Proxy Redirects Chip Panarchy (Mar 04)