Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking

[Ansgar Wiechers <bugtraq () planetcobalt net>]

On 2008-10-01 Razi Shaban wrote:
> > Since it doesn't interfere with their phishing attempt: why would
> > they remove any of the original content? However, a script that's
> > supposed to detect a phishing attempt is a whole different matter.
>
> A script that is supposed to detect a phishing attempt is the actual
> topic of this discussion. You come in here telling everyone they're
> doing everything wrong, and you don't even know what's being
> discussed? What?

You lack reading comprehension. There is no need for a phisher to tamper
with the original content as long as that original content doesn't
interfere with the phishing attempt. Once that premise changes, it is
unreasonable to assume that phishers *still* won't tamper with the
orignial site's content. Isn't that obvious?

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
-- 
"All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches
becoming available."
--Jason Coombs on Bugtraq