Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: microsoft updates
From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq () planetcobalt net>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:49:56 +0100
On 2008-01-02 Dead Sector wrote:
On Dec 31, 2007 3:14 PM, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers wrote:On 2007-12-31 Dave Koontz wrote:Umm... check out Windows Genuine Advantage. Pirated copies will fail updates (as they should).No, they shouldn't. Not being able to update won't magically make people buy Windows instead of running pirated copies. They'll just cease updating, so we'll continue to have a healthy bot population. Thank you, Microsoft.it's not supposed to make people buy windows, It is supposed to make people stop using pirated copies of windows.
Which it won't.
and they'll just cease updating and it it microsoft's fault? what operating system accepts responsibility for the user's actions?
It was Microsoft's decision to make updating (not pirating!) harder. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "The Mac OS X kernel should never panic because, when it does, it seriously inconveniences the user." --http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2004/tn2118.html
Current thread:
- Re: microsoft updates, (continued)
- Re: microsoft updates Ali, Saqib (Jan 02)
- RE: microsoft updates Worrell, Brian (Jan 02)
- Wired security improvements Jesse Rink (Jan 03)
- Re: Wired security improvements Kurt Buff (Jan 03)
- Re: Wired security improvements Andrea Gatta (Jan 03)
- Re: Wired security improvements Garry Baker (Jan 04)
- RE: microsoft updates Worrell, Brian (Jan 02)
- RE: microsoft updates Pranav Lal (Jan 03)
- RE: microsoft updates jmacaranas (Jan 03)
- Re: microsoft updates Ali, Saqib (Jan 02)
- RE: microsoft updates David Harley (Jan 02)
- RE: microsoft updates Dixon, Wayne (Jan 02)
- Re: microsoft updates Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Jan 02)
- Re: microsoft updates Tom Yarrish (Jan 02)
- RE: microsoft updates Edward Ling (Jan 03)