Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please.
From: "Thyago Braga da Silva" <tbraga () gasecurity com br>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:22:22 -0200
Hi Chris. You can find in the topic 7.3.1 (Clear desk and clear screen policy) included in Physical and environmental security topic, where the objective is to prevent compromise or theft of information and information processing facilities. c) Personal computers and computer terminals and printers should not be left logged on when unattended and should be protected by key locks, passwords or other controls when not in use. It means that your organization should provide mechanisms for not exposing information on computers. And it's related with "the use of automated workstation locking after X minutes". If that is necessary and not made, the organization is not in compliance to ISO/IEC 17799 or 27002. =================================== Thyago Braga da Silva Gestor de Projetos de Segurança da Informação GA Security and Audit Rua da Quitanda 19, 714 Rio de Janeiro - Centro CEP: 20011-030 Telefone: 55-21-2242-0835 Celular: 55-21-8747-7232 ----------------- I am hoping that the experts on this list might be able to assist me with problem. I have a consultant who is doing some audit work for the company I work for. This consultant has been quoting information about best business practice and standards and has my managment in a bit of a tizzy. So far I have been able to prove or disprove most things that he has been telling my managment, but I am stuck one and it seems that this item has struck a nerve. The consultant has claimed that both NIST and ISO-17799 recomend the use of automated workstation locking after X minutes. I have found information on the NIST Standard but have not been able to find anything on the ISO-17799 standard (or atleast not without buying it). Does anyone on the list happen to have a copy of ISO-17799, if so could you help me prove or disprove this comment? I have done several google searches and all of the links I get end up asking me to purchase the Standard. I think having it would be a good thing, just that I do not have money in my budget to purchase it. Many thanks in advance, Chris.
Current thread:
- Re: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please., (continued)
- Re: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. Roch (Jan 11)
- RE: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. Beryl Podoll (Jan 14)
- RE: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. Abimbola, Abiola (Jan 11)
- Re: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. Tima Soni (Jan 16)
- Re: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. Tima Soni (Jan 17)
- Re: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. chief (Jan 12)
- Re: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. anirudh vidolkar (Jan 14)
- Re: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. jenna (Jan 14)
- Re: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. WALI (Jan 21)
- Re: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. Sheldon Malm (Jan 14)
- RE: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. Thyago Braga da Silva (Jan 14)
- RE: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. Ardian Silvano (Jan 15)
- Re: ISO IEC 27002 (ISO-17799) assistance please. Roch (Jan 11)