Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: What does it mean for a vulnerability to be retired?
From: Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt <gl89 () cornell edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:33:40 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Under the "Discussion" tab for this securityfocus.com BID is the note: "NOTE: This BID is being retired because information provided by the vendor reveals that the application is not vulnerable to this issue." Extrapolating from this sampling of one, I'd bet that RETIRED is fairly rarely used. -g - -- Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt Cornell University IT Security Office On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Terra Frost wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 <http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26885> is an example of a vulnerability whose status has been changed to RETIRED. My question is.. what, exactly, does that mean? My guess is that it means that the vulnerability is bogus. But why, then, say it's RETIRED and not BOGUS? It's hard to misinterpret BOGUS, but rather easy to misinterpret RETIRED. Further, if that is indeed what RETIRED means, why would the above report, under "Vulnerable", say "WordPress", when, in fact, it isn't? Maybe, if anything, it should say WordPress and then have a strikethrough through it? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHbAHOhzLeabOflWcRAnJMAJoCmRiHYnmOLgjywLPn/RQHs4RWOwCdGreH wIJDT6A+rtFf/KXkg8Icsis= =Qtls -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFHbAcKLyw7nZwiKgQRAlmYAKD3IWMYKa4ostdxF5dJiAL01I8roACfYVfV dbauyYdeNbBrNeQCxZwiqw8= =OAht -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- What does it mean for a vulnerability to be retired? Terra Frost (Dec 21)
- Re: What does it mean for a vulnerability to be retired? George A. Theall (Dec 21)
- Re: What does it mean for a vulnerability to be retired? Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt (Dec 21)