Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)
From: Bob Radvanovsky <rsradvan () unixworks net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:02:41 -0500
Standard warning banner disclaimer that works at ALL levels: !!!!!! W A R N I N G !!!!!! THIS IS A PRIVATE COMPUTER SYSTEM. UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. This computer system including all related equipment, network devices (specifically including Internet access), are provided only for authorized use. All computer systems may be monitored for all lawful purposes, including to ensure that their use is authorized, for management of the system, to facilitate protection against unauthorized access, and to verify security procedures, survivability and operational security. Monitoring includes active attacks by authorized personnel and their entities to test or verify the security of the system. During monitoring, information may be examined, recorded, copied and used for authorized purposes. All information including personal information, placed on or sent over this system may be monitored. Uses of this system, authorized or unauthorized, constitutes consent to monitoring of this system. Unauthorized use may subject you to criminal prosecution. Evidence of any such unauthorized use collected during monitoring may be used for administrative, criminal or other adverse action. Use of this system constitutes consent to monitoring for these purposes. ----- Original Message ----- From: Craig Wright [mailto:cwright () bdosyd com au] To: hfebelingjr () lycos com, security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)
Hello, CERT, SANS and the IEEE all have detailed taxonomies. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY has a few dissertations available on the topic. Craig -----Original Message----- From: Ebeling, Jr., Herman Frederick [mailto:hfebelingjr () lycos com]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 May 2006 7:34 AM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Wireless Security (Part 2)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A few months back we had a discussion going about whether or not a person who has setup a Wi-Fi network for their and their families use. And IF someone illegally connects to said network if the person who setup the network has the right to go into the other person's computer to find out who they are. The consensus is/was that sadly no the person who setup the Wi-Fi network doesn't have the right to go into the intruder's computer to find out who they are. What IF the person who sets up the Wi-Fi network has a web page, or a dialog box that is displayed that says the following whenever a new computer signs onto the network: WARNING You have connected to a PRIVATE COMPUTER NETWORK IF you were NOT invited to join the network then leave now. IF you continue to use the network, know that by doing so you consent to having your computer inspected for the purpose of finding out who you are so that the proper authorities can be notified. IF you leave now no actions will be taken, but IF you continue then the appropriate actions WILL be taken, you have been WARNED. This is your ONLY warning, leave NOW. Also know that along with your name your computers MAC address will also be recorded, and blocked in the future. If the above is setup as a web page then the capitalized words would be in bold as well as red to catch the person's attention. Also with the above they wouldn't be able to say that they weren't warned, correct? - ----- Herman Live Long and Prosper ___________________ _-_ \==============_=_/ ____.---'---`---.____ \_ \ \----._________.----/ \ \ / / `-_-' __,--`.`-'..'-_ /____ ||- `--.____,-' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 Comment: Space the Final Frontier iQA/AwUBRGjzqx/i52nbE9vTEQL2VgCfa6k5g7v+iXyLAWn8x0C4puoejFIAnA0l pyeqL5W4eOfzDQCLuHEk31Q/ =c+u5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia where such legislation exists. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use or disclose the information. If you have received this email in error, please inform us promptly by reply email or by telephoning +61 2 9286 5555. Please delete the email and destroy any printed copy.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. You may not rely on this message as advice unless it has been electronically signed by a Partner of BDO or it is subsequently confirmed by letter or fax signed by a Partner of BDO. BDO accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unauthorised access.
Current thread:
- Re : Wireless Security (Part 2), (continued)
- Re : Wireless Security (Part 2) Maxime COSTE (May 16)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) David Gillett (May 16)
- Re: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ian Scott (May 17)
- Re: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (May 17)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ebeling, Jr., Herman Frederick (May 20)
- Re: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (May 20)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ebeling, Jr., Herman Frederick (May 20)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Craig Wright (May 16)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Steve Armstrong (May 16)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ebeling, Jr., Herman Frederick (May 17)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ramsdell, Scott (May 16)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Bob Radvanovsky (May 16)
- Re: Wireless Security (Part 2) Robb Wait (May 20)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Bob Radvanovsky (May 16)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Craig Wright (May 17)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Craig Wright (May 17)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Murad Talukdar (May 17)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ebeling, Jr., Herman Frederick (May 20)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Craig Wright (May 20)
- Re: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ian Scott (May 23)
- RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ebeling, Jr., Herman Frederick (May 23)
- Re: Wireless Security (Part 2) Ian Scott (May 23)
- Re: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) mikem (May 20)
(Thread continues...)