Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: in-to-out security


From: "David Gillett" <gillettdavid () fhda edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:02:27 -0800

  All of these various technical measures are, at heart, policy
enforcement mechanisms.  If he does not have a policy to guide 
their deployment, they cannot be considered a "solution".
  So:  the real question here is:  Should users be told what the
policy is?

  If users are not told what the policy is, they cannot be subject
to disciplinary action for violating it.  A secret policy is 
simply not enforceable.  Which may make it kind of moot.

David Gillett


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe George [mailto:j.george () conservation org] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:33 AM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: in-to-out security

Dear all,
 
I hope you're all doing well.  A colleague of mine does 
technical support for some charities on the side.  One of his 
clients is a person who is the CTO of a 400+ person, 
non-profit organization.  This CTO asked my colleague what 
was the best way to (a particular application or training 
method) to get his 400+ staff in-line and keep them from 
doing inappropriate things on the network such as downloading 
rogue applications, and inadvertently installing apps which 
can attack the network and other networks.  He's looking for 
an in-to-out solution.
This CTO feels he and his team would be able to secure the 
network from intrusion from outside rogue users by 
implementing necessary firewall, IDS, etc.  I suggested to my 
colleague that this gentleman can not adequately secure 
external/internal intrusion and attacks without implementing 
an acceptable use or some kind of written policy with the 
assistance of his HR department.  I informed him that 
end-users should have the right to know that their activity 
is being monitored by the IT staff (which is what I presumed 
he meant by an application/training method to keep his staff 
in-line).  This CTO fellow, feels that any kind of policy is 
not a viable option.  I told my colleague a written policy 
will protect the organization and the employees and allow the 
security team to build and design a security countermeasures, 
not to mention get the best use of expensive security 
appliances.  Besides rogue applications, I mentioned that 
other issues such as disgruntled employees, corporate 
espionage, maintaining data and company integrity are just a 
few reasons to start off with written policy.  My colleague 
mentioned that his CTO client is not uninformed, but rather 
too scared to bring up a very controversial solution as 
written policy to his superiors and the end-users. My 
questions to you are these:
 
1.    Was I right to suggest this rather than help my colleague look
for an app/training solution?
2.    How would you convince an obviously passive CTO to do the right
thing?
3.    If such an application/training exists, can you suggest
something? 
4.    Is it legal to implement user-monitoring without informing the
staff?  This is where I think policy 
 
Thanks in advance.
 
Take it easy,
 
Joe 

--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE 
The Norwich University program offers unparalleled Infosec 
management education and the case study affords you unmatched 
consulting experience. 
Tailor your education to your own professional goals with 
degree customizations including Emergency Management, 
Business Continuity Planning, Computer Emergency Response 
Teams, and Digital Investigations. 

http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE
The Norwich University program offers unparalleled Infosec management 
education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. 
Tailor your education to your own professional goals with degree 
customizations including Emergency Management, Business Continuity Planning, 
Computer Emergency Response Teams, and Digital Investigations. 

http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: