Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Multihome based network attacks
From: "J Jude" <jmjudeb () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:28:41 -0700
We use simple hardware profiles. When the user boots, they have to choose between cabled and wireless. In the former, the wireless NIC is disabled, and in the latter, the Ethernet NIC is disabled. For the most part, this works well, but MSWin sometimes reenables the wireless card, e.g. if an administrative account queries the card properties. -----Original Message----- From: Verma, Neeraj K [mailto:Neeraj_K_Verma () Keane com] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 12:14 PM Subject: RE: Multihome based network attacks What is possible solution --- to disable the wireless option of Laptops users, which can be enforced using technical approach. i.e. the moment laptop user log-on into Enterprise wired LAN / Windows Active Directory Domain; the wireless card get disabled automatically. I believe we can achieve this using either -- logon scrips or -- AD Group Policies. ... --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: Norwich University EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINEThe NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence in Information Security. Our program offers unparalleled Infosec management education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree, without disrupting your career or home life.
http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Multihome based network attacks smith . norton (Aug 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Multihome based network attacks krymson (Aug 24)
- RE: Multihome based network attacks Verma, Neeraj K (Aug 25)
- RE: Multihome based network attacks Verma, Neeraj K (Aug 28)
- Re: Multihome based network attacks J Jude (Aug 29)
- RE: Multihome based network attacks Scott Ramsdell (Aug 29)