RE: FW: CompTIA security+ versus SANS boot camp security essentials...

[Murad Talukdar <talukdar_m () subway com>]

Thanks Corey/Adrian,
> From what you both say-the theoretical approach is more CompTIA's bag.
However, I learn better when there is more hands on/break things and fix
them type activity, so this has me leaning more towards the GSEC. I know
that being an online course will make it a bit harder but from what I've
read/heard, everyone still gains from this format. 

I take on board what you said about the mcse and CompTIA though, Adrian.
I know that even where I work at the moment we're going to have more
opportunity to get into Linux/UNIX type scenarios, so it would be good to
have a grounding in that.

Murad




-----Original Message-----
From: Corey LeBleu [mailto:coreylebleu () gmail com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 4:10 AM
To: Murad Talukdar
Subject: Re: FW: CompTIA security+ versus SANS boot camp security
essentials...

Security+ is more theory and administration oriented whereas GSEC is
more hands on and covers that stuff.  I'm Security+ certified and have
looked at an old GSEC book.  I would say go for the GSEC.

Corey

On 7/24/05, Murad Talukdar <talukdar_m () subway com> wrote:
> I'm being allocated some of the company's mandatory training budget
> and wanted people's experience/views on the differences of the two courses
> that I'm sourcing:
>
> CompTIA Security+(in class)
> SANS Security essentials bootcamp(online)
>
> Has anyone done both(unlikely, methinks) and which one would be (slightly)
> more Windows-centric? Also, which one would be more suited to a network
> admin who wants to head more in the security direction.
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
> Murad Talukdar