RE: RPC over HTTP security

["Eric McCarty" <eric () piteduncan com>]

Your joking right.

"SSL in and of itself provides very little security"

That's why most of the internet uses it right?. 

Your gonna have to back up statements like yours with some serious
factual backing otherwise your comments will be discarded as B.S coming
form someone who doesn't know what they are talking about.

E. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Doheny [mailto:kdoheny () CNP net] 
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 5:06 AM
To: Shawn Wall; sf_mail_sbm () yahoo com; security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: RPC over HTTP security

SSL in and of itself provides very little security... Way to easy to
hack.  Look into a Neoteris (now Juniper) SSL VPN/Proxy.  This way evil
hack3r can not ride the SSL stream into your network and past any IDS or
IPS systems. 

Kevin 

-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Wall [mailto:sjwall () shaw ca]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 11:04 PM
To: sf_mail_sbm () yahoo com; security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: RPC over HTTP security

Are you using Exchange? Why not use OWA and secure it with SSL?

shawn 

-----Original Message-----
From: sf_mail_sbm () yahoo com [mailto:sf_mail_sbm () yahoo com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 6:03 AM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RPC over HTTP security



Hi List,
We are thinking about deploying RPC over HTTP to access email from the
Internet

Wanted to get some information on the technology and the security
implications of same

Not much info from Microsoft's site

any help would be greatly apreciated

Thanks,
Ronish