Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: is Checkpoint smart defance is enough ?
From: Rodrigo Blanco <rodrigo.blanco.r () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 02:56:40 -0600
Hello, I would say Firewall-1's Smart Defense s a good add-on on the firewallng functionality, but it is not a dedicated IPS. Hence, its capabilities are also not at the same level. If you really need a good Intrusion Prevention device, I would go for a standalone box such as McAfee Intrushield. If you are thinking of an internal network, you could also take a look at CheckPoint Interspect. Of course, this always depends on your budget (I tend to remember Smart Defense comes in basic with FW-1 and it is not expensive to obtain the upgrades), network topology and security requirements, but if security is an issue, I would recommend deplying a specialized device. Best regards, Rodrigo. On 8/2/05, Juan B <juanbabi () yahoo com> wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if I enable smartdafance on a network so I can give up all the other IDS's like snort Iss etc. Is smartdefance considered as an IDS at all ? thanks Juan ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Current thread:
- is Checkpoint smart defance is enough ? Juan B (Aug 02)
- Re: is Checkpoint smart defance is enough ? routerg (Aug 03)
- Re: is Checkpoint smart defance is enough ? Rodrigo Blanco (Aug 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: is Checkpoint smart defance is enough ? Hitesh Patel (Aug 03)
- RE: is Checkpoint smart defance is enough ? THolman (Aug 03)
- Re: is Checkpoint smart defance is enough ? Ivan C (Aug 03)
- Re: is Checkpoint smart defance is enough ? aner . sagi (Aug 03)
- Re: is Checkpoint smart defance is enough ? Ivan C (Aug 03)
- Re: is Checkpoint smart defance is enough ? andrew_conly (Aug 03)