Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: filter ssl traffic
From: "Corey Scott" <corey () motionworks com my>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:28:00 +0800
I am not sure if this discussion is getting of track or not, but I think the fundamental question we need to ask before we can give a good response is, why do you want the proxy to be able to see the traffic unencrypted? If all you want to do is make sure they are not going to a certain site than I am fairly certain that a proxy like SQUID will be able to block sites, do logging and a whole heap of things you probably never thought off. As to if use wish to read the traffic, surely there is a moral question of why you want to, but what about the practical one. What could you possibly achieve by it? Cheers, Corey Corey Scott - Technical Director corey () motionworks com my Motionworks Sdn. Bhd. 'creating web experiences' www.motionworks.com.my HP: 016.652.6787 Tel: (603) 2282 5060 Fax: (603) 2284 5060 --- Outgoing mail appears to be Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.505 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 30/07/2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- filter ssl traffic zidan (Nov 17)
- Re: filter ssl traffic Vladimir B. Kropotov (Nov 24)
- RE: filter ssl traffic Burton M. Strauss III (Nov 25)
- Re: filter ssl traffic Phil Brammer (Nov 25)
- Re: filter ssl traffic Vladimir B. Kropotov (Nov 27)
- Re: filter ssl traffic Byron Sonne (Nov 27)
- RE: filter ssl traffic Corey Scott (Nov 28)
- RE: filter ssl traffic Burton M. Strauss III (Nov 25)
- Re: filter ssl traffic Vladimir B. Kropotov (Nov 24)