Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: wireless policies


From: "Steve" <securityfocus () delahunty com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:56:11 -0500

Tactical field units like the 82nd Airborne make use of wireless networks
that are not necessarily authorized and can likely easily be hacked.  Yes -
I am somewhat off topic.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Meritt James" <meritt_james () bah com>
To: "Alessandro Bottonelli" <a.bottonelli () axis-net it>
Cc: <security-basics () securityfocus com>; <netethix () iprimus com au>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: wireless policies


In my PERSONAL view (having retired from the military after 20 years), I
would not want to be associated with a broadcast unit in a tactical
environment which would provide targetting information.  That it was
encrypted would not matter to an anti-radiation missile.

Alessandro Bottonelli wrote:

I am supporting a military client of mine on a very similar task.



-- 
James W. Meritt CISSP, CISA
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
phone: (410) 684-6566

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forum Systems PRESIDIO: PGP / XML GATEWAY APPLIANCE
The Presidio integrates PGP data encryption and XML Web Services security to
simplify the management and deployment of PGP and reduce overall PGP costs
by up to 80%.
FREE WHITEPAPER & 30 Day Trial -
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/ForumSystems_security-basics_031027
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forum Systems PRESIDIO: PGP / XML GATEWAY APPLIANCE
The Presidio integrates PGP data encryption and XML Web Services security to 
simplify the management and deployment of PGP and reduce overall PGP costs 
by up to 80%.
FREE WHITEPAPER & 30 Day Trial - 
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/ForumSystems_security-basics_031027 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: