Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Cisco Pix Vs. Symantec Velociraptor
From: "Ted Frederick" <tfrederick () ascentek com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 21:28:37 -0500
Thanks for the input all. The only thing that the VR had going for it was the reporting so they are going to use WebSense with the Pix. Ted -----Original Message----- From: Ted Frederick [mailto:tfrederick () ascentek com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 11:50 AM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Cisco Pix Vs. Symantec Velociraptor Hello List. I have a client that is a multi-location bank with about 150 users sharing a 384K Internet connection using Novell Border Manager as their firewall. The Internet connection is used for hosting their e-mail, Browsing, and a few web based apps. In the future they are considering VPN for remote access. They are considering either the Pix or the Velociraptor as a replacement solution for the BM server. I am very familiar with Pix and what it can do but I have minimal experience with the Velociraptor. Can anyone out there with experience of both give me a compare and contrast of the two? Thanks
Current thread:
- Cisco Pix Vs. Symantec Velociraptor Ted Frederick (Mar 17)
- RE: Cisco Pix Vs. Symantec Velociraptor Ted Frederick (Mar 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cisco Pix Vs. Symantec Velociraptor SimonChan (Mar 18)
- RE: Cisco Pix Vs. Symantec Velociraptor Stadler, Brian T (Mar 18)
- RE: Cisco Pix Vs. Symantec Velociraptor Stadler, Brian T (Mar 20)
- RE: Cisco Pix Vs. Symantec Velociraptor David Gillett (Mar 21)
- Re: Cisco Pix Vs. Symantec Velociraptor Cheryl Goh (Mar 24)
- RE: Cisco Pix Vs. Symantec Velociraptor Paris Stone (Mar 24)