Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: Transparent Screen Lock for Win NT/2000/XP


From: Cathy Milan <cathymilan () excite com>
Date: 14 Aug 2003 15:59:01 -0000

In-Reply-To: <C8A731F5343EA044BF77A732838D223B139FBDB4 () fastenal com>

Hi Angie,

Thanks for the feedback. This is exactly the kind of information
I was looking for.  

I was unable to reproduce your problem so I contacted the company
and was informed that this was a problem that was addressed in
one of the newer versions.  Can you verify this.  I am using
a dual-monitor setup and the problem does not occur.  How exactly
are you set up?

Cathy


I played with it a little since it was nicer than the Clear Screen Saver 
by
MS.  However, if you are running virtual desktop software, it only locks 
the
desktop you're on, not the others.  Hence, I could bounce my mouse and get
to my secondary desktop that was completely active even though my primary
desktop was locked and protected.  That was the kicker for me, at least on
client machines.


-----Original Message-----
From: Cathy Milan [mailto:cathymilan () excite com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 6:37 PM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Transparent Screen Lock for Win NT/2000/XP




We have been testing the Transparent Screen Lock 



http://www.e-motional.com/TScreenLock.htm



It basically allows you to prevent access to a Windows server

but allows the display to be visible.Before going ahead with 

a large scale installation I was wonderingif any of you guys 

have had any experience with it (Both good orbad) that may 

affect our decision.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: