Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public
From: "Ryan Parr" <ryanparr () thejamescompany com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 02:00:13 -0700
Please disregard this. I spoke too soon. My soapbox have been dusty... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ryan Parr" <ryanparr () thejamescompany com> To: <security-basics () securityfocus com> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:00 PM Subject: Re: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public
I think that a community wide boycott of Foundstone, Inc and it's
affiliates
is in order. In fact, I think that *not* boycotting this company and those who choose to not boycott it as well would be criminally unethical. ----- Original Message ----- From: <bettyford5555 () yahoo com> To: <security-basics () securityfocus com> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:44 AM Subject: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the publicWhat does the community think of this news - http://www.ntobjectives.com/pressrelease_lawsuit.html? Seems big Foundstone is trying to keep others from releasing free tools to the community. Maybe I'm misinterpreting, but didn't they used to talk
about
the benefits of providing these types of tools to combat hacking? Perhaps I'm wrong and just misunderstanding their position.
Current thread:
- RE: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public security (Oct 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public Ryan Parr (Oct 15)
- Re: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public Ryan Parr (Oct 17)
- Re: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public Roy Pait (Oct 15)
- RE: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public Bill Martin (Oct 15)
- RE: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public ronstevens (Oct 15)
- RE: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public Greg van der Gaast (Oct 17)
- Re: Foundstone - keeping free tools from the public Jac (Oct 16)