Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: SETI@Home - Safe or Exploitable? - How About UD?
From: "Doc Farmer" <Doc.Farmer () qatarbank com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 06:38:17 +0300
Greetings! Speaking of distributed computing, has anyone ever heard of vulnerabilities regarding United Devices (UD) software? I'm hoping to run their cancer research program (LIGANDFIT) at my office, and to date I've not heard of any potential security problems. If you have, please let me know. Many thanks. Doc Farmer Doha, Qatar -----Original Message----- From: James Shaw [mailto:jshaw () gwstephens com] Sent: Monday, 21 October 2002 01:45 To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: SETI@Home - Safe or Exploitable? Never gave this too strong a consideration until I read a TechRepublic article pondering the safety of running distributed computing programs on corporate computers. While I discourage our employees from installing personal software on company computers and I monitor our workstations for unapproved installations, I do not want to be completely dictatorial and allow some seemingly innocuous software to be installed once I satisfy my own security/licensing/stability issues. Seti@Home is one such program. While it is understandable that there could be some concern caused by the use of this program because it remotely sends and retrieves data for processing, I have never heard of SETI being exploited. Any thoughts, opinions, or facts the community would like to share would be appreciated.
Current thread:
- SETI@Home - Safe or Exploitable? James Shaw (Oct 21)
- Re: SETI@Home - Safe or Exploitable? Johan De Meersman (Oct 22)
- RE: SETI@Home - Safe or Exploitable? - How About UD? Doc Farmer (Oct 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SETI@Home - Safe or Exploitable? counterpol (Oct 23)
- RE: SETI@Home - Safe or Exploitable? Trevor Cushen (Oct 24)
- RE: SETI@Home - Safe or Exploitable? Tim Donahue (Oct 25)