Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: On building better statistics
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 21:01:42 +0100
On 15 Feb 2022, at 13:20, João Valverde <j () v6e pt> wrote: And also, it's not really correct to include IP inside ICMP as IP bytes, but that's another issue entirely.
Looking at the Protocol Hierarchy statistics, only the ‘top level’ protocols are counted. So, an IP header in a ICMP packet don’t get added. You can see that with IPv6, there you can choose to have the IPv6 extension headers under the root tree rather than under the IPv6 packet. If you put them under the root, they’ll show up in the Protocol Hierarchy statistics, otherwise not. Regards, Jaap
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- On building better statistics Jaap Keuter (Feb 13)
- Re: On building better statistics João Valverde (Feb 14)
- Re: On building better statistics Maynard, Christopher via Wireshark-dev (Feb 14)
- Re: On building better statistics João Valverde (Feb 15)
- Re: On building better statistics Jaap Keuter (Feb 15)
- Re: On building better statistics João Valverde (Feb 15)
- Re: On building better statistics João Valverde (Feb 14)