Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet
From: Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:23:21 -0700
On Apr 15, 2021, at 2:03 AM, Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:
Wireshark is a complicated project to build. You can follow the tested way, as shown in the Developers Guide, which is essentially what our Continuous Integration (CI) systems use and most other developers, or you can forge your own path on less travelled routes strewn with rocks, rusty nails and broken glass that you mostly have to deal with on your own. Unless you have some inescapable need to do things in a different way, it's easier and more productive to follow the herd.
Building in a subdirectory with a name other than "build" isn't exactly a "[route] strewn with rocks, rusty nails and broken glass". *That* should Just Work (at least if the name is all ASCII printable characters and contains no spaces); if it doesn't, that's a sign that the build process isn't robust enough. Building in the source directory *itself* is a bit more painful, but that doesn't appear to be what we're talking about here; it sounds as if we're talking about mkdir build.wireshark cd build.wireshark cmake .. make ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Vincent Randal (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Guy Harris (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Vincent Randal (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Pascal Quantin (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Vincent Randal (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Guy Harris (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Vincent Randal (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Guy Harris (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Vincent Randal (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Guy Harris (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Graham Bloice (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Guy Harris (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Graham Bloice (Apr 15)
- Re: (1) building Wireshark in build.wireshark fails, (2) how to get dissector details without packet Richard Sharpe (Apr 15)