Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Status label for issues
From: Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:43:54 +0200
Diff between current and proposal list: - incident - question - cli::tshark + ui::tshark - ui::gtk - version::0.x - version::1.0 - version::1.10 - version::1.12 - version::1.2 - version::1.4 - version::1.6 - version::1.8 - version::2.0 - version::2.2 - version::2.4 - version::2.6 - version::3.0 + version::outdated + ws-status::unconfirmed + ws-status::confirmed + ws-status::waiting-for-response + ws-status::in-progress + ws-status::invalid + ws-status::wontfix + ws-status::fixed + ws-status::duplicate I have no strong feelings about the os::* labels. We can reduce them to os::mac, os::windows, os::linux, os::unix. Am 26.04.21 um 23:13 schrieb Roland Knall:
The list seems to be duplicated with the lists from above. Anyhow, it seems we just have too many labels already, and I am still not convinced that they can be used properly and consistently at this point I would clean up the proposal list first, then from there figure out which items we need on the list cheers Roladn
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Graham Bloice (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Pascal Quantin (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Graham Bloice (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Pascal Quantin (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Jirka Novak (Apr 24)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Eugène Adell (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Guy Harris (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Graham Bloice (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)