Wireshark mailing list archives
Adventures in cherry-picking
From: John Thacker <johnthacker () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 08:56:19 -0400
Right now, cherry-picking via the GitLab GUI seems pretty broken. It appends to the commit message some informative text[1] like: " (cherry picked from commit 273eb06390821597d632606587ad79a8e152e122)" Which is reasonably helpful enough, but adds the two blank lines, not just one[2], in recent cases I've tested. The extra blank line causes it to fail the "git stripspace" check in tools/validate.commit.py and thus fail the pipelines. There's no way around this from the GUI, since the commit message is automatically created. Changing the merge request message doesn't affect the commit itself; the cherry-picked branch can be pulled and altered on the command line, but one might as well just use the CLI for all of the cherry-picking instead of GitLab's GUI. Checking, I see that this has hit other people as well: https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/695 Another irritating thing I have found with cherry-picking into multiple branches (e.g., release-3.4 and master-3.2) from the original wireshark repository is that GitLab automatically names cherry-pick branches using only the commit name but not the target branch.[3] What's worse is that if I create a cherry pick branch for release-3.4, and then immediately go back to the same commit in wireshark master and try to create a cherry-pick branch for master-3.2, I get an error in the GUI like: "A branch called 'cherry-pick-e42cc671' already exists. Switch to that branch in order to make changes" If I slightly vary things and create one cherry-pick from the main GitLab repository's master and the other cherry-pick from my local fork of master, then I do get two branches, one named 'cherry-pick-{hash}' and the other named 'cherry-pick-{hash}-2'. I'm not sure where I'd turn to get a cherry-pick into the target master-3.0. Perhaps cherry-picking a cherry-picked commit. Has anyone else run into this, and do you have a workaround? Our existing workflow has been built around cherry-picking, and this makes it harder. John Thacker [1] - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/issues/32348 [2] - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/merge_requests/13475/diffs - The code has been moved around this since this merge, but it's the same behavior [3] - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/18825 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17462
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Adventures in cherry-picking John Thacker (Oct 24)