Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Code of Conduct for our community
From: Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:15:22 +0200
Am 05.08.20 um 19:06 schrieb Richard Sharpe:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:49 AM Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu> wrote:
Thanks for your feedback Richard!
As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of Conduct (CoC) as helpful for our community.Why? Nothing is broken at the moment, so nothing needs fixing, AFAICT.
For me this is about improving and not about fixing.
I would suggest the following alternative approach that the Samba team seems to have adopted: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/How_to_do_Samba:_Nicely
The Samba CoC can also be a starting point. I'm missing here a clear encouragement for diversity and openness. The scope should also be a broader (we have ask.wireshark.org and Sharkfest etc.).
As far as I can recall, there have been no instances of the behavior the Contributor Covenant seems to protect against, so what is the point here?
It defines clear expectations and rules. Of course it can't protect against violating the rules (like it is with all kind of rules and laws). Cheers Uli ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Code of Conduct for our community Uli Heilmeier (Aug 05)
- Re: Code of Conduct for our community Richard Sharpe (Aug 05)
- Re: Code of Conduct for our community ronnie sahlberg (Aug 05)
- Re: Code of Conduct for our community Uli Heilmeier (Aug 24)
- Re: Code of Conduct for our community Paul Williamson (Aug 24)
- Re: Code of Conduct for our community Richard Sharpe (Aug 05)