Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:25:32 -0700
On 4/29/20 9:47 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi list, While working on the IDL dissectors, so packet-coseventcomm.c, packet-cosnaming.c, packet- gias.c, packet-parlay.c and packet-tango.c, I was able to use the idl2wrs toolchain to regenerate all these dissectors (with minor issues), with the exception of packet-parlay.c. There the diff extensive and seems limited to the /* User exception filters */ area. A superficial look gives the impression that all items are there, that just the ordering is very different. Anyone an idea why that would be?
It looks like get_exceptionList in wireshark_gen.py doesn't sort the list it returns. According to the Python 3 documentation[1], dicts use insertion order in 3.7 and later, but that may or may not be the case in earlier versions. [1]https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#dictionary-view-objects ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Regenerating packet-parlay.c Jaap Keuter (Apr 29)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Gerald Combs (Apr 29)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Luke Mewburn (Apr 29)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Luke Mewburn (Apr 29)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Jaap Keuter (Apr 30)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Luke Mewburn (Apr 30)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Jaap Keuter (Apr 30)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Luke Mewburn (Apr 29)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Gerald Combs (Apr 29)