Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol?
From: Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:56:15 -0400
Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org> wrote: > It's complex, too - and I don't know whether anybody's done a CMake > version of that. > Would it make more sense to put the rpcap I-D into either 1) a separate > team and repository or 2) another repository in the pcapng group, so > that it has its own Makefile? That's my preference. One draft per repo. If you like, make those repo(s) submodules of libpcap if one wants a stronger connection between the documents and the code.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description:
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Richardson (Apr 02)
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris (Apr 01)
- Message not available
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Richardson (Apr 02)