Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Migrate to GitLab?
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:32:30 -0700
On 10/11/19 3:38 PM, Jano Svitok wrote:
- gitlab issues are OK, but bugzilla is much more elaborate (for example allows custom fields and most of all, allows custom states -- gitlab flow and issue states is fixed! custom states have to be simulated using tags). I am not that familiar with wireshark bugzilla, but I suggest that someone that is familiar goes through typical workflows, and checks that all needed information can be stored in gitlab issues.
Is "elaborate" a good thing in our case? For example, searching closed bugs for arbitrary text is more difficult in BZ than it is in GitLab. As far as custom fields go, it looks like GitLab lets you set a template for issues[1], which should cover the information we currently require for new Bugzilla bugs. Documenting our different workflows is a great idea, and should be added to the Bugzilla and Gerrit gitlab-migration wiki pages.
https://gitlab.com/wireshark/gitlab-migration/wikis/home seems to be in a private repo.
Fixed. Thanks!
You may want to check cmake's gitlab instance: https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake
This brings up something I've held off asking until now. What flavor of GitLab should we use? It looks like our options are: - gitlab.com Free[2] - gitlab.com Ultimate[2] - Self-managed Free[3] - Self-managed Gold[3] GitLab offers Ultimate and Gold licenses for FOSS projects[4] at no charge, but I'm confused about what KitWare, KDE, and GNOME are using since they aren't in the OSS project list file[5]. [1]https://gitlab.com/help/user/project/description_templates#setting-a-default-template-for-issues-and-merge-requests [2]https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/gitlab-com/feature-comparison/ [3]https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/self-managed/feature-comparison/ [4]https://about.gitlab.com/solutions/open-source/program/ [5]https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/community-relations/gitlab-oss/blob/master/data/oss_projects.yml ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Migrate to GitLab?, (continued)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Roland Knall (Oct 08)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Guy Harris (Oct 08)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Tomasz Moń (Oct 08)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Dario Lombardo (Oct 08)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Guy Harris (Oct 08)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Roland Knall (Oct 08)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Dario Lombardo (Oct 08)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Roland Knall (Oct 08)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? João Valverde (Oct 08)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Gerald Combs (Oct 11)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Jano Svitok (Oct 11)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Gerald Combs (Oct 11)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? João Valverde (Oct 17)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Gerald Combs (Oct 11)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? João Valverde (Oct 11)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Graham Bloice (Oct 12)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Roland Knall (Oct 12)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Roland Knall (Oct 12)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? João Valverde (Oct 12)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Peter Wu (Oct 12)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? João Valverde (Oct 12)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? Pascal Quantin (Oct 12)
- Re: Migrate to GitLab? João Valverde (Oct 12)