Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Performance with large capture files
From: Chad Dailey <wireshark () thedaileyplanet com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:26:46 -0500
A bunch of RAM, SSD, sometimes setting the swap file to fixed / zero size (if you have enough RAM) is helpful. On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Deny IP Any Any <denyipanyany () gmail com> wrote:
Anyone have tips on things to make working with large (3GB filesize, 4.5m packets) capture files better? CPU/Memory/Disk are not maxed in resmon but it takes fooooorever to do many common tasks in the UI. Using current version Wireshark on a modern gaming Win10 computer. I know smaller files are easier but sometimes you don't have an option. -- deny ip any any (4395643193 matches) ____________________________________________________________ _______________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject= unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Performance with large capture files Deny IP Any Any (Sep 08)
- Re: Performance with large capture files Maynard, Chris (Sep 10)
- Re: Performance with large capture files Chad Dailey (Sep 10)