Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector?
From: Antoine d'Otreppe <a.dotreppe () aspyct org>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 08:52:39 +0000
Hi Peter, hi Anders, Thanks for the pointers! I'll look into it and report back here when I have more information on the topic. Cheers, Antoine ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, November 9, 2018 9:32 AM, Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com> wrote:
-----Original Message-----From: Wireshark-dev wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org On Behalf Of Peter Wu Sent: den 9 november 2018 00:22 To: Antoine d'Otreppe a.dotreppe () aspyct org; Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev () wireshark org Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector? Hi Antoine! Based on the specifications for Syncthing, it appears that it uses Protobuf for defining its messages: https://docs.syncthing.net/specs/ I am not sure how well protobuf is currently supported on Wireshark, you could scan the issue tracker and code review site to see if there is any current work in that area. Kind regards, Peter https://lekensteyn.nl (pardon my brevity, top-posting and formatting, sent from my phone)Hi, I think these pending commits are relevant: https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/22892/ https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/23988/ Regards Anders On November 8, 2018 9:32:50 PM GMT+01:00, Antoine d'Otreppe a.dotreppe () aspyct org wrote:Hi there, I'm interested in learning more about wireshark in general, and in particular learning how to make my own dissectors. I just happened to find a protocol that doesn't seem to have any dissector for it yet: syncthing. https://syncthing.net/ The local discovery protocol looks easy enough to begin with, as it is only UDP broadcasts. Your developer guide recommends to send a mail before starting development to check if anyone else would be working on a similar topic. That sounds reasonable :) Anybody working on that protocol yet? Regards, Antoine d'OtreppeSent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev () wireshark org Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev () wireshark org Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector? Antoine d'Otreppe (Nov 08)
- Re: Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector? Peter Wu (Nov 08)
- Re: Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector? Anders Broman (Nov 09)
- Re: Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector? Antoine d'Otreppe (Nov 09)
- Re: Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector? Maciej Krüger (Nov 09)
- Re: Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector? Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev (Nov 09)
- Re: Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector? Antoine d'Otreppe (Nov 09)
- Re: Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector? Anders Broman (Nov 09)
- Re: Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector? Peter Wu (Nov 08)