Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: lemon
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 14:28:59 -0800
On Mar 10, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com> wrote:
I'm working to reduce the number of warnings coming from clang code analyzer. The tool lemon (from project sqlite, if I'm not mistaken) is full of warnings, and (if I recall correctly) we had some issues pushing patches upstream. I can see two roads we can take to reduce this high amount of warnings: 1) patch our copy of lemon, without pushing upstream 2) suppress clang's analysis for this file. Which one is more desirable?
We're already not identical to upstream, as far as I know, with our own changes; I'd vote for 1). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe