Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking
From: Thomas Wiens <th.wiens () gmx de>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:51:23 +0100
On 13.01.2018 08:31, Roland Knall wrote:
Could you create a bug entry for this, including an example trace, with which we could demonstrate this behavior ?
There is still an issue with this. Should I reopen the bug or create a new one? The subtree is now opened correctly, but only if you have selected a tree element under the root tree. For the sample capture within tcp tree: select #1, expand tcp, expand tcp.flags select #2, tcp is expanded down to tcp.flags as expected select the ip root node select #1, tcp is closed -- Cheers Thomas ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Subtree expand/collapse tracking Thomas Wiens (Jan 12)
- Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking Roland Knall (Jan 12)
- Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking Thomas Wiens (Jan 13)
- Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking Richard Sharpe (Jan 13)
- Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking Guy Harris (Jan 13)
- Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking Thomas Wiens (Jan 15)
- Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking Michael Mann via Wireshark-dev (Jan 15)
- Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking Thomas Wiens (Jan 13)
- Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking Roland Knall (Jan 12)