Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: One quick question
From: Krishnamurthy Mayya <krishnamurthymayya () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:50:41 +0530
Okay. So, If I am sending continuos stream of data at the line rate(1gb/s) and if I am using wireshark to capture the content, it will crash after sometime due to memory exhaustion. Is there any way to bypass this ? (Any free function/some other work around) Any suggestion from your side would be extremely helpful. Thanks in advcane Regards, Krishnamurthy mayya On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
On Jan 8, 2018, at 5:29 AM, Krishnamurthy Mayya < krishnamurthymayya () gmail com> wrote:epan_get_frame_ts Like the above function, is there any utility function in wiresharkwhich fress the memory allocated for the given frame_num ? Are you assuming that epan_get_frame_ts() returns a pointer to a freshly-allocated structure that must be freed when the caller no longer needs it? If so, no, it doesn't. You do not need to free the structure. ____________________________________________________________ _______________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject= unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- One quick question Krishnamurthy Mayya (Jan 08)
- Re: One quick question Guy Harris (Jan 08)
- Re: One quick question Krishnamurthy Mayya (Jan 29)
- Re: One quick question Paul Offord (Jan 29)
- Re: One quick question Krishnamurthy Mayya (Jan 29)
- Re: One quick question Guy Harris (Jan 08)