Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Gerrit problems ?


From: Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 13:56:29 +0200

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 1:40 PM Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl> wrote:

I’m not sure what to make of this but I noticed the following:
After having a (rather unremarkable) change ( 28995) accepted and merged
by Anders (thanks Anders!) I received the usual two emails about this
(Code-Review +2, Merged). The remarkable thing is that the emails have an
impressive Reply-To list, with all kinds of people on them, who, apart from
Anders, have not shown any interest in this change.
Before the upgrade this was only the party performing the actions who was
stated in the Reply-To header.


I'm observing the same in Peter's last change, merged by Anders. I was
notified because of my gerrit filters, but not directly involved.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: