Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: epan/asm_utils* and NASM
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:11:28 -0700
On Oct 13, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:
Before we migrated away from NMake, epan/Makefile.nmake built the assembly versions of various routines for x86 (but not x64) defined in epan/asm_utils_win32_x86.asm. Should we resurrect it in epan/CMakeLists.txt or get rid of it along with the NASM download in tools/win-setup.ps1?
Are there any platforms on which the assembler versions are significantly faster than the non-assembler versions? If not, I'd say get rid of it. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- epan/asm_utils* and NASM Gerald Combs (Oct 13)
- Re: epan/asm_utils* and NASM Guy Harris (Oct 13)
- Re: epan/asm_utils* and NASM Guy Harris (Oct 13)
- Re: epan/asm_utils* and NASM João Valverde (Oct 14)
- Re: epan/asm_utils* and NASM Graham Bloice (Oct 16)
- Re: epan/asm_utils* and NASM Guy Harris (Oct 16)
- Re: epan/asm_utils* and NASM Guy Harris (Oct 13)