Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:04:21 +0000
Hi, Maybe start off by checking other files, eg.the documentation files first. The dissectors are the easy targets. Thanks,, Jaap
On 10 Nov 2017, at 10:44, Darien Spencer <cusneud () mail com> wrote: Since this patch was merged, should we start replacing (manually or automaticly) the license info in other files such as dissectors? Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 at 6:09 PM From: "Gerald Combs" <gerald () wireshark org> To: "Developer support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs Earlier today I gave a short talk about navigating Wireshark's source code. One thing I mentioned is that we have quite a bit of boilerplate at the top and bottom of most files, and in the past this has confused git when copying and renaming files (for me, at least). I've uploaded a change at https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/24302/ <https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/24302/> which starts the process of replacing the GPLv2-or-later blurb at the top of various files with "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+". Is there any reason we shouldn't go ahead with this?
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs Gerald Combs (Nov 08)
- Re: SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs Darien Spencer (Nov 10)
- Re: SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs Jaap Keuter (Nov 10)
- Re: SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs Gerald Combs (Nov 11)
- Re: SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs Jaap Keuter (Nov 10)
- Re: SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs Darien Spencer (Nov 10)