Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: OSX build fails
From: João Valverde <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 11:26:46 +0000
On 22-11-2017 11:02, Roland Knall wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:45 AM, João Valverde <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt <mailto:joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt>> wrote:On 22-11-2017 08:37, Roland Knall wrote: Might be a stupid question but on my account, only Linux machines are now capable of building Wireshark out of the box with autotools on default, right? I'm not sure what you mean by "on default", but it seems unlikely that anyone could build Wireshark without having to install at least one dependency. BSDs usually supply a gmake command for GNU Make. Not sure if it is installed by default.Installing a dependency is one thing, and fine by me. This includes installing a newer version of make. But for certain builders, that might not be an option (older Linux systems) as no packages might exist, and they will have to build from source. In those cases, building the make-system from source, just to use autotools is too much to ask for in my book. All those people have already an alternative in place though with cmake, but still, autotools sets the bar a little higher then cmake, and that is in my opinion not a good idea if both systems should be equal by design. So if they should be equal, that would also require the same prerequisites, or at least the same level of obtainability.
That would be "installing a newer version of make" on OSX because of licensing issues.
I don't understand either your logic of build systems "equal by design". I would hope not, that seems kind of pointless.
We are giving a lot of thought to ancient systems with all sorts of restrictions. I don't disagree with that, it's generally a good thing to be considerate, but it remains to be seen the impact on systems other than OSX.
For OSX please use CMake instead.
But again, not going so far as to suggest removal, was just wondering the general issue.cheers ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- OSX build fails Dario Lombardo (Nov 21)
- Re: OSX build fails Guy Harris (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails Roland Knall (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails Guy Harris (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails Roland Knall (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails Roland Knall (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails Anders Broman (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 24)
- Re: OSX build fails Roland Knall (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails Guy Harris (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails Eliot Lear (Nov 22)