Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Devices in tshark versus dumpcap
From: Gisle Vanem <gvanem () yahoo no>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 11:36:48 +0200
I wrote:
The is for sure a problem in how lines of text are generated in dumpcap.exe and how tshark is interpreting them. I'm not even sure the lines have "\r\n" terminations since from dumpcap.c: #ifdef _WIN32 /* set output pipe to binary mode, to avoid ugly text conversions */ _setmode(2, O_BINARY); And in capchild/capture_ifinfo.c: raw_list = g_strsplit(data, "\r\n", 0);
That was the problem, Changing this into: raw_list = g_strsplit(data, "\n", 0); things work as normal! -- --gv ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Devices in tshark versus dumpcap Gisle Vanem (Apr 29)
- Re: Devices in tshark versus dumpcap Graham Bloice (Apr 29)
- Re: Devices in tshark versus dumpcap Gisle Vanem (Apr 29)
- Re: Devices in tshark versus dumpcap Graham Bloice (Apr 29)
- Re: Devices in tshark versus dumpcap Gisle Vanem (Apr 30)
- Re: Devices in tshark versus dumpcap Gisle Vanem (Apr 30)
- Re: Devices in tshark versus dumpcap Gisle Vanem (Apr 30)
- Re: Devices in tshark versus dumpcap Gisle Vanem (Apr 29)
- Re: Devices in tshark versus dumpcap Graham Bloice (Apr 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Devices in tshark versus dumpcap Gisle Vanem (Apr 29)