Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Filtering on (negated) frame.time_relative filters out wrong frame.number
From: Miroslav Rovis <miro.rovis () croatiafidelis hr>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 21:52:01 +0200
On 170317-11:29+0000, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 17 March 2017 at 11:23, Peter Wu <peter () lekensteyn nl> wrote:
...
Or use editcap to drop the packets; editcap infile outfile packet#1 packet#2
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I have tried just that above, and have the same issue. While my message is awaiting moderation for over two hours (and I'm *not* saying that anything is wrong, but want to let know of this issue with a short notice, and move on, while I wait), I posted about it on: Same Issue with Editcap https://www.croatiafidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-170313-git-devuan-mail/git-devuan-mail-4.php Not re-sending the much longer message, as I'm advised in the notice. -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia https://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Filtering on (negated) frame.time_relative filters out wrong frame.number Miroslav Rovis (Apr 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Filtering on (negated) frame.time_relative filters out wrong frame.number Miroslav Rovis (Apr 28)