Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Where to add new SMB2 ioctl dissectors?
From: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 08:01:16 +0200
Hi Gordon, If we want to add some value on smb2_ioctl_vals value_string, need to be sorted. This array/value_string use "binary tree" (for optimization stuff) and need to be sorted Cheers On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Gordon Ross <gordon.w.ross () gmail com> wrote:
What's the convention on placement of new SMB2 ioctl dissectors? In the same order as the smb2_ioctl_vals[] array? Or new ones at the end? (or whatever the submitter did? :) Thanks, Gordon ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Where to add new SMB2 ioctl dissectors? Gordon Ross (May 27)
- Re: Where to add new SMB2 ioctl dissectors? Alexis La Goutte (May 30)