Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:37:46 -0500
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com> wrote:
*From:* wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Morriss *Sent:* den 23 februari 2016 15:07 *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com> wrote: On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:48 AM, João Valverde < joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt> wrote: On 22-02-2016 14:28, Jeff Morriss wrote: On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Wireshark code review <code-review-do-not-reply () wireshark org <mailto:code-review-do-not-reply () wireshark org>> wrote: e282c19 by João Valverde (joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt <mailto:joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt>): autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags Before: WS_LDFLAGS=' -Wl,--as-needed -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib' After: WS_LDFLAGS=' -Wl,--as-needed -L/usr/local/lib' Bumps autoconf required version to 2.64. FWIW this means Wireshark master (to become 2.2) will no longer work on RHEL/CentOS 6 (which has autoconf 2.63). I don't seem to have an easy way to check SLES. (Just for the record) Anders' config.log shows that his SLES 11.2 system is also running autoconf 2.63. I noted that too, is it possible to easily update autoconf? (RPM?) Or would that drag in all kinds of dependencies? Long term I’d like to push my users to SLES 12.1 anyway. Regards Anders
I'd imagine that an RPM would cause too much damage. But I have this vague memory that someone had installed an updated autoconf (in /usr/local) on one of our RHEL 5 machines which extended how long I could build Wireshark there for a couple of years. I think they just downloaded the source, compiled, and installed it. Not the best for those who like to keep their system clean (all software in RPMs) but it worked.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags Jeff Morriss (Feb 22)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags João Valverde (Feb 22)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags Jeff Morriss (Feb 22)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags Jeff Morriss (Feb 23)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags Anders Broman (Feb 23)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags Jeff Morriss (Feb 23)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags João Valverde (Feb 23)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags Jeff Morriss (Feb 22)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e282c19: autotools: Fix multiple repetitions of -L build flags João Valverde (Feb 22)