Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Enabling/disabling post dissectors
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 14:19:08 -0800
On Dec 24, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Michael Mann <mmann78 () netscape net> wrote:
We have 4 post-dissectors in the current source (mate, transom, snort, prp) and only mate defaults to being enabled (based on quick grep of API calls, it may be smart enough to be "disabled" if there is no configuration).
Presumably meaning "the user won't have to enable MATE manually if they've configured it - it'll automatically enable itself if configured and disable itself if not configured". ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Enabling/disabling post dissectors Michael Mann (Dec 24)
- Re: Enabling/disabling post dissectors Guy Harris (Dec 25)