Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: wtap.h / struct ieee802_11n & ac presence_flags
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:21:06 -0700
On Sep 24, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Simon Barber <simon.barber () meraki net> wrote:
I am porting my radiotap only timeline code over to use the new radio dissector, and found the use of the flags aesthetically unpleasing (since I refer to them a lot). Would you object to me converting them to single bit fields, and memsetting the whole union to 0 to clear them?
No, I'm OK with that. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- wtap.h / struct ieee802_11n & ac presence_flags Simon Barber (Sep 24)
- Re: wtap.h / struct ieee802_11n & ac presence_flags Guy Harris (Sep 24)
- Re: wtap.h / struct ieee802_11n & ac presence_flags Simon Barber (Sep 24)
- Re: wtap.h / struct ieee802_11n & ac presence_flags Guy Harris (Sep 24)
- Re: wtap.h / struct ieee802_11n & ac presence_flags Simon Barber (Sep 24)
- Re: wtap.h / struct ieee802_11n & ac presence_flags Guy Harris (Sep 24)