Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic
From: miro.rovis () croatiafidelis hr
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:28:48 +0200
On 151014-09:25-0700, gedropi () allmail net wrote:
Given that AT&T (and other telcos) have been making mirrored copies of phone messages for years (see EFF discovery), since Google has been saving our data on freighters in the Atlantic & Pacific, since Google & ad companies have been holding ports open and forcing their presence if we would like content served (somewhat like extortion),
Sure! All the stinking (sorry, still disgusted by the time it took me to figure it out)... [Sure! All the stinking] SPDY and HTTP2 have come to existince for that freaking sole reason! They're not there other then to push content onto users! And probably more, but I'd need loong more to get to know more about those. I studied it, and you can read about my conclusions in the matter here: SSL Decode & My Hard-Earned Advice for SPDY/HTTP2 in Firefox https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1029408.html and partly I posted on this Wireshark ML about it: The SSL tcp stream decoding in Users' Manual? https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/201509/msg00009.html
the concept of legality has vanished due to the complicity of so many.
Well, let's fight to make it illegal again, then!... I've been spending dedicated time in duration of weekends to weeks, several times a year, for a number of years already, just to learn these mechanisms... (and I'm not surely there yet) Let's fight to make it illegal again, all that snooping! Just like Bruce Schneier said somewhere: let's take the internet back! The guy, I don't remember his name, that started this thread and wants to attack the users of his company, he is just one of many, but still make me feel disgusted. Let's take the internet back! Yes it means taking on the big players (primarily), but that is exactly what may be, very slowly, starting to be happening. Such as Edward Snowden is simply not anymore dismissed easily by any half serious media... Such as the Safe Harbor (data going from Europe to U.S. and archived there) having been struck down by the European Court of Justice, thanks to, IIRC, Maximillian Schrems (again, IIRC), so Facebook will have to play by the EU rules from now on, and not stash all of its harvests in the U.S. ... Help your users, don't launch attacks on them, but help them to learn to fend off attacks and maintain their privacy, if you can! Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description:
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic, (continued)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic Patrick Klos (Oct 09)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic Mark Semkiw (Oct 12)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic Noam Birnbaum (Oct 12)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic Hugo van der Kooij (Oct 13)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic Larry Rogers (Oct 13)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic Mark Semkiw (Oct 13)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic Noam Birnbaum (Oct 13)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic Mark Semkiw (Oct 14)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic gedropi (Oct 14)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic Mark Semkiw (Oct 14)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic miro . rovis (Oct 15)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic Noam Birnbaum (Oct 12)
- Re: dissecting HTTPS traffic frnkblk (Oct 20)