Re: wiretap - using as a library rather than coupled with Wireshark?

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Nov 26, 2015, at 1:18 AM, Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com> wrote:

> Provided that this is not a published lib, that has an unstable interface, that... whatever constraint you can figure 
> out, I think that it could be used "as-is". To achive that wouldn't be enough to add the wiretap/ to the include dirs 
> of the compiler and the compiled .so to the linker? Is there a step I am missing?

That depends on what Richard means by "independently of Wireshark".

If he means "can I extract the source to libwiretap, and have a source tree with *only* that, and not bother building 
the rest of Wireshark?", then the steps you're missing are the steps to do exactly that (and to extract the source to 
libwsutils).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe