Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string.
From: Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 08:28:01 +0200
2015-05-13 0:26 GMT+02:00 Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>:
On May 12, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:Argh, one of these days I will learn to just put parentheses in rather than taking guesses at C operator precedence :(Yeah, the rule I've found works best for me is "if you aren't certain, throw parentheses at it".
Yes, in this case parentheses are a must. I also llike putting them when the reader may not guess the precedence correctly easily. This reader can be myself later ;-). Cheers, Balint ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Evan Huus (May 12)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Guy Harris (May 12)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Bálint Réczey (May 12)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Graham Bloice (May 13)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Bálint Réczey (May 12)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Guy Harris (May 12)