Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Latest code broken?
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 23:39:43 -0700
On Mar 16, 2015, at 11:14 PM, Anil <anilkumar911 () gmail com> wrote:
compiling on a different machine, the problem does not show up. Wondering what cleanup needs to be done on the old build machine. Are there any files other than under the source tree, that needs to be cleaned up ?
If you built from a Git checkout, then: if you built with ./configure rather than CMake, I would do: make maintainer-clean ./autogen.sh ./configure make if you built with CMake, I would, from the directory in which the Wireshark source directory is contained: rm -rf build mkdir build cd build cmake ../{the name of the Wireshark source directory} make If you built from a downloaded source tarball, I would: download the latest source tarball; do an rm -rf of the Wireshark source directory; extract from the source tarball; then: if you are building with ./configure rather than CMake: cd to the extracted source directory; ./configure; make if you are building with CMake: mkdir build (if that fails with "File exists", do "rm -rf build" followed by "mkdir build"); cd build cmake ../{the name of the Wireshark source directory} make ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Latest code broken? Anil (Mar 15)
- Re: Latest code broken? Pascal Quantin (Mar 15)
- Re: Latest code broken? Anil (Mar 15)
- Re: Latest code broken? Graham Bloice (Mar 16)
- Re: Latest code broken? Anil (Mar 16)
- Re: Latest code broken? Guy Harris (Mar 16)
- Re: Latest code broken? Anil (Mar 15)
- Re: Latest code broken? Pascal Quantin (Mar 15)