Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: MPLS dissection fail


From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:53:37 +0200

2015-06-13 14:51 GMT+02:00 Francesco Fondelli <francesco.fondelli () gmail com>
:

I think we should revert to the original behavior as suggested in the
bug report.  WS being able to automatically dissect the majority of
MPLS encapsulated traffic with the first nibble set to 0 is a feature
we should preserve.


Hi Francesco,

Jasper suggested a simple heuristic. I added you as a reviewer of
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/8912/

Pascal.


thank you
ciao
fra

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Jasper Bongertz <jasper () packet-foo com>
wrote:
Hi all,

I just added a bug report, as agreed with Alexis, regarding the
dissection failure in 1.99 when a frame contains MPLS shims. This is
the bug report URL:

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11271

and I also attached a screen shot comparing 1.12.5 and 1.99 to this
email (I hope it doesn't get stripped off by the list)

Cheers,
Jasper

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: