Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Buildbot Lua Init Tests
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadrielk () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 23:20:36 -0400
Yeah, I figured it would break Lua when I saw his changes on gerrit this morning, but he was doing the changes in little pieces so I thought I’d wait until some of it got into master before doing the necessary changes to wslua. -hadriel
On Jul 3, 2015, at 9:57 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote: The buildbot test suite is currently failing on the lua step, I believe because Peter's recent init/cleanup split has changed the number of times the init function is called, which is breaking expectations in the lua bindings somewhere. The fix may be as simple as changing the "expected number of calls" in the test suite, but I'm not sure if there may be other things the lua bindings use init routines for that also need fixing? Evan ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Buildbot Lua Init Tests Evan Huus (Jul 03)
- Re: Buildbot Lua Init Tests Hadriel Kaplan (Jul 03)
- Re: Buildbot Lua Init Tests Hadriel Kaplan (Jul 03)
- Re: Buildbot Lua Init Tests Hadriel Kaplan (Jul 03)