Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: mux27010 capture
From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:50:41 -0500
On 1/14/2015 5:26 AM, Lars Poeschel wrote:
I am sorry for messing up the mails thread id, but it is very hard to answer to a mail where one itself is not the receipient. I am not subscribed to the mailing list.
I'm not familiar with the protocol but the following may help: http://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes/LINKTYPE_MUX27010.htmlThanks for that. I did not know this. If I understand this right, this does not comply with the 3gpp specification, but instead a special siemens/cinterion variant of the protocol that is not compatible with the original 3gpp protocol. It would be great to note that fact somewhere in the wireshark code and/or in the wireshark doc.
(Done, already... :) ) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- mux27010 capture poeschel (Jan 02)
- Re: mux27010 capture Bill Meier (Jan 02)
- Re: mux27010 capture Bill Meier (Jan 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: mux27010 capture Lars Poeschel (Jan 14)
- Re: mux27010 capture Bill Meier (Jan 14)
- Re: mux27010 capture Bill Meier (Jan 02)