Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Moving codecs to libwireshark or libwsutil?
From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 21:25:58 +0100
2015-11-30 20:15 GMT+01:00 Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>:
On Nov 30, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com> wrote:Yes I should have been clearer in my initial description. My suggestion with an extra parameter giving the hash table address isalso working fine, so I do not have a strong feeling either way (the changed parameter is faster to do but might not be the best long term solution). Unless there's some compelling reason for them *not* to be in a dynamic library, I think making libcodec a dynamic library the best long-term solution.If possible I would like to have this fixed for Wireshark 2.0.1 but Iwonder if such change is compatible with our usual policy to keep APIs constant (does it apply when they are buggy?). Making it a dynamic library wouldn't change the API.
Done: https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/12385/1
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Moving codecs to libwireshark or libwsutil? Pascal Quantin (Dec 02)
- Re: Moving codecs to libwireshark or libwsutil? Bálint Réczey (Dec 03)