Wireshark mailing list archives
use of FT_PROTOCOL
From: Cody Doucette <doucette () bu edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:17:22 -0400
I am trying to extend the XIP dissector to include a sub-protocol that should only come after an XIP header. I want it displayed at the top-level in the "Packet Details" pane, so adding this protocol *inside* of the XIP dissector code seems like a good choice. I think FT_PROTOCOL will allow me to do this. But on the other hand, the new protocol is somewhat complicated, and for readability would probably be better suited as its *own* dissector in a separate file. Is there a preferred way to proceed in this kind of case? All of the uses of FT_PROTOCOL in dissectors that I can see appear to be fairly simple. Thanks! Cody
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- use of FT_PROTOCOL Cody Doucette (Aug 21)
- Re: use of FT_PROTOCOL Hadriel Kaplan (Aug 21)
- Re: use of FT_PROTOCOL mmann78 (Aug 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: use of FT_PROTOCOL Cody Doucette (Aug 26)
- Re: use of FT_PROTOCOL Hadriel Kaplan (Aug 26)
- Re: use of FT_PROTOCOL Hadriel Kaplan (Aug 21)