Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: How do the Gerrit reviews progress?
From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 16:38:10 -0700
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
Somebody will review it and either: - provide comments if it needs work - +2 and merge it if they like it - +1 if they like it but want a second opinion In any case, Gerrit will send you an email when something happens. I see your review in the queue, but nobody's had a chance to look at it yet. I honestly think our patch turn-around time has gotten a lot better since moving to Gerrit, but we're still always just a little behind :)
Thanks. I wasn't complaining, just wanting to know the procedure. I think Gerrit is an excellent mechanism for allowing others to submit improvements etc. -- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- How do the Gerrit reviews progress? Richard Sharpe (May 26)
- Re: How do the Gerrit reviews progress? Evan Huus (May 26)
- Re: How do the Gerrit reviews progress? Richard Sharpe (May 26)
- Re: How do the Gerrit reviews progress? Evan Huus (May 26)